首页 > AI前沿 > MIRA: Mutual Information guided calibration for Reliable Test-Time Adaptation

MIRA: Mutual Information guided calibration for Reliable Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv机器学习 2026-11-01 23:43 4 阅读 查看原文

Background and motivation

Test-time adaptation (TTA) updates a deployed model using only unlabeled target data, but standard entropy-based methods often rely on deterministic confidence and can reinforce overconfident errors under distribution shift.

Proposed method: MIRA overview

We propose MIRA, Mutual Information guided calibration for Reliable Test-Time Adaptation, a source-free online adaptation method that uses lightweight last-layer Gaussian perturbations to probe prediction reliability.

For each target batch, MIRA reuses a single feature extraction pass and samples perturbed classifiers around the source classifier, forming an efficient local predictive distribution.

Scale selection via mutual information and agreement

Rather than fitting a Bayesian posterior, MIRA treats the perturbation scale as a local probing radius and selects a batch-specific scale using mutual information (MI) and prediction agreement.

Reliability signal and adaptation behavior

The resulting perturbation-sensitivity signal identifies predictions that are confident and locally stable under classifier perturbations, while suppressing brittle predictions with high stochastic disagreement.

MIRA then performs adaptation with an MI-confidence weighted entropy loss, which down-weights perturbation-sensitive or low-confidence samples before they drive entropy minimization.

This weighted loss reduces the influence of brittle predictions that can otherwise cause harmful adaptation under distribution shift.

Practical requirements and plug-and-play property

The method requires no source data, retraining, model ensembles, or offline posterior fitting, and can be applied as a plug-and-play modification to entropy-minimization TTA.

Experiments and takeaway

Experiments on distribution-shift benchmarks show improvements in accuracy, calibration, and negative log-likelihood, suggesting that mutual-information-guided perturbation probing and weighted adaptation yield more robust online TTA than deterministic confidence.