`包裹，长文用`
`/`
`划分小节。 3. 列表内容用`
- `，引用用`
`，代码用`
`，重要句子可用``。
4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。
5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。
分析正文内容：
"Model architecture shapes the scaling behavior, training efficiency, and inference cost of LLMs, making it a central focus of both industry and academia. In industry, teams such as those behind DeepSeek, Qwen, and Kimi routinely introduce architectural innovations, yet public reports rarely document which ideas succeeded, which were abandoned, and why. In academia, limited compute and inconsistent baselines often restrict evaluations to small-scale, single-point comparisons, making it difficult to establish whether improvements hold at larger scales or translate into broader impact." -> 这是一个自然段落。
"ArchSpace addresses both gaps as a public platform for Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}: each proposal is recorded with its experiments and reasoning, reviewed by the community, and referenced by later work." -> 注意原文中有个拼写错误 "Researc}"，规则要求“不得增删改内容”，所以我必须原样保留 "Researc}"。这是一个自然段落。可以把 "Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}" 加粗，作为重要句子。
"To evaluate ideas before costly large-scale training, ArchSpace leverages scaling laws to predict model loss at larger scales from smaller experiments, a practice widely adopted in industry." -> 自然段落。
"We provide initial references that make the platform usable: Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe." -> 这里有个列表的意味："Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe"。可以改成 `- `，但是要小心不要改变原文的词句。原文是 "Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe." 如果改成列表：
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines
- fitted scaling laws
- a reusable training recipe
这样是否算“增删改内容”？把句子拆分成列表项，去掉了逗号和and。为了严格遵守“不得增删改内容”，最好保持原句在``中，或者如果必须用列表，就保留原样？规则说“列表内容用
- ”，意思是如果内容是列表，就用。这里其实是一个冒号引出的三个并列项。我可以用`
`，但为了绝对安全，直接放在`
`里，或者用`
`但保持文字完全不变（这很难，因为列表项不需要and和逗号）。其实直接用`
`包裹整句是最安全的，或者把前半句放`
`，后半句放`
`：
We provide initial references that make the platform usable:
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines
- fitted scaling laws
- a reusable training recipe
这样去掉了 "and" 和逗号，可能被判定为修改内容。还是整句放`
`里比较稳妥，或者：
We provide initial references that make the platform usable:
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines,
- fitted scaling laws,
- and a reusable training recipe.
（HTML中ul不能直接嵌套在p中，会有解析错误）。 所以最安全的做法是整段用`
`包裹，不强行拆成列表，因为原文是用文字描述的并列，而不是典型的列表格式。或者我可以把整句放在`
`中。 再看最后一段："Ideas validated through this review can in turn become new baselines, and ArchSpace thereby aims to broaden the range of ideas that shape the next generation of models." -> 自然段落。 考虑到规则2：“长文用
/
划分小节”。这篇新闻不算特别长，但可以分为几个小节。 比如：
背景与挑战
（但是加小标题算“增”内容吗？规则说“长文用
/
划分小节”，这意味着我需要添加标题。但规则4说“不得增删改内容”。添加小标题属于增加内容吗？通常排版中的标题是为了结构，但为了严格遵守“不得增删改内容”，我最好不添加额外的文字标题，或者使用非常泛的标题？不，如果添加了标题文字，就是增加了内容。如果不添加，怎么满足“长文用
/
划分小节”？这篇正文只有4句话，其实不算“长文”。所以我可以直接全部用`
`包裹，不需要`
`，代码用``，重要句子可用``。 4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。 5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。 分析正文内容： "Model architecture shapes the scaling behavior, training efficiency, and inference cost of LLMs, making it a central focus of both industry and academia. In industry, teams such as those behind DeepSeek, Qwen, and Kimi routinely introduce architectural innovations, yet public reports rarely document which ideas succeeded, which were abandoned, and why. In academia, limited compute and inconsistent baselines often restrict evaluations to small-scale, single-point comparisons, making it difficult to establish whether improvements hold at larger scales or translate into broader impact." -> 这是一个自然段落。 "ArchSpace addresses both gaps as a public platform for Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}: each proposal is recorded with its experiments and reasoning, reviewed by the community, and referenced by later work." -> 注意原文中有个拼写错误 "Researc}"，规则要求“不得增删改内容”，所以我必须原样保留 "Researc}"。这是一个自然段落。可以把 "Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}" 加粗，作为重要句子。 "To evaluate ideas before costly large-scale training, ArchSpace leverages scaling laws to predict model loss at larger scales from smaller experiments, a practice widely adopted in industry." -> 自然段落。 "We provide initial references that make the platform usable: Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe." -> 这里有个列表的意味："Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe"。可以改成 `
- `，但是要小心不要改变原文的词句。原文是 "Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe." 如果改成列表：
这样是否算“增删改内容”？把句子拆分成列表项，去掉了逗号和and。为了严格遵守“不得增删改内容”，最好保持原句在`
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines
- fitted scaling laws
- a reusable training recipe
`中，或者如果必须用列表，就保留原样？规则说“列表内容用
- ”，意思是如果内容是列表，就用。这里其实是一个冒号引出的三个并列项。我可以用`
`，但为了绝对安全，直接放在`
`里，或者用`
`但保持文字完全不变（这很难，因为列表项不需要and和逗号）。其实直接用`
`包裹整句是最安全的，或者把前半句放`
`，后半句放`
`：
We provide initial references that make the platform usable:
这样去掉了 "and" 和逗号，可能被判定为修改内容。还是整句放`
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines
- fitted scaling laws
- a reusable training recipe
`里比较稳妥，或者：
We provide initial references that make the platform usable:
（HTML中ul不能直接嵌套在p中，会有解析错误）。 所以最安全的做法是整段用`
- Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines,
- fitted scaling laws,
- and a reusable training recipe.
`包裹，不强行拆成列表，因为原文是用文字描述的并列，而不是典型的列表格式。或者我可以把整句放在`
`中。 再看最后一段："Ideas validated through this review can in turn become new baselines, and ArchSpace thereby aims to broaden the range of ideas that shape the next generation of models." -> 自然段落。 考虑到规则2：“长文用
/
划分小节”。这篇新闻不算特别长，但可以分为几个小节。 比如：
背景与挑战
（但是加小标题算“增”内容吗？规则说“长文用/
划分小节”，这意味着我需要添加标题。但规则4说“不得增删改内容”。添加小标题属于增加内容吗？通常排版中的标题是为了结构，但为了严格遵守“不得增删改内容”，我最好不添加额外的文字标题，或者使用非常泛的标题？不，如果添加了标题文字，就是增加了内容。如果不添加，怎么满足“长文用
/
划分小节”？这篇正文只有4句话，其实不算“长文”。所以我可以直接全部用`
`包裹，不需要`
/
`，因为不是长文。或者，把第一句话作为引言，后面作为小节？ 为了安全，不添加任何原文没有的文字。如果不用`
/
`，就只用`
`。 让我们仔细检查原文： 1. Model architecture shapes... broader impact. 2. ArchSpace addresses... later work. 3. To evaluate ideas... in industry. 4. We provide initial... training recipe. 5. Ideas validated... of models. 排版设计：
Model architecture shapes the scaling behavior, training efficiency, and inference cost of LLMs, making it a central focus of both industry and academia. In industry, teams such as those behind DeepSeek, Qwen, and Kimi routinely introduce architectural innovations, yet public reports rarely document which ideas succeeded, which were abandoned, and why. In academia, limited compute and inconsistent baselines often restrict evaluations to small-scale, single-point comparisons, making it difficult to establish whether improvements hold at larger scales or translate into broader impact.
ArchSpace addresses both gaps as a public platform for Recording, Reviewing, and Referencing Architecture Researc}: each proposal is recorded with its experiments and reasoning, reviewed by the community, and referenced by later work.
To evaluate ideas before costly large-scale training, ArchSpace leverages scaling laws to predict model loss at larger scales from smaller experiments, a practice widely adopted in industry.
We provide initial references that make the platform usable: Qwen3.5 and OLMo3 baselines, fitted scaling laws, and a reusable training recipe.
Ideas validated through this review can in turn become new baselines, and ArchSpace thereby aims to broaden the range of ideas that shape the next generation of models.
检查规则： 1. 只输出HTML片段本身，不要Markdown围栏、不要解释。 -> 满足。 2. 每个自然段落用包裹，长文用
/
划分小节。 -> 这里不是长文，所以只用
。如果非要用h2/h3，又不能用自己编的标题（违反规则4），所以不用h2/h3是合理的。 3. 列表内容用
- ，引用用
，代码用
，重要句子可用。 -> 使用了，没有列表、引用、代码。 4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。 -> 原文的 "Researc}" 保留。没有增加任何文字。 5. 不要输出//等文档级标签。 -> 满足。 再审视一下 "Researc}"，这是原文里的拼写错误（可能是OCR或复制错误，Research 变成了 Researc}），规则要求不得增删改，所以必须原样保留。 确认HTML标签闭合，没有多余空格。Model architecture shapes the scaling behavior, training efficiency, and inference cost of LLMs, making it a central focus of both industry and academia. In industry, teams such as those