首页 > AI前沿 > Geometry of Confabulation and Refusal in Small Language Models

Geometry of Confabulation and Refusal in Small Language Models

arXiv机器学习 2026-11-01 05:14 5 阅读 查看原文

研究背景与基准介绍

Faced with an unanswerable question, small language models can either refuse or confabulate: confidently produce a wrong answer. Can the hidden state before the first generated token provide a clue? Can we flip confabulations into refusals?

I introduce ConfabQA, a 784-item benchmark whose obscure-pre-cutoff category breaks the typical correctness/knowledge-cutoff confound and map the geometry of the hidden state with linear probes, a sparse autoencoder (SAE), and direct optimization of intervention directions.

不同模型上的实验表现

  • On Qwen3-1.7B and Gemma 2 2B the probe separates upcoming refusals from confabulations well beyond prompt features (+7.4/+16.3 pp).
  • On Llama 3.2 3B the ConfabQA margin is within fold-to-fold spread, but a direct refusal probe on PopQA and TriviaQA recovers +18-25 pp.

实验分析与机制探讨

On Qwen I closely inspect three candidate directions for the refusal vector:

  • probe-recovered
  • Qwen-Scope SAE feature
  • directly optimized

Although