`包裹，长文用`
`/`
`划分小节。 3. 列表内容用`
- `，引用用`
`，代码用`
`，重要句子可用``。
4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。
5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。
* 输入文本：一段关于LLM agent修复方法的学术/技术新闻/摘要。
2. 分析输入文本结构：
* 第一句：“When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place.” (引入背景)
* 第二句：“They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log.” (现有方法)
* 第三句：“We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them.” (提出问题/研究目标)
* 第四句：“Holding failed trajectories and candidate single-step repairs fixed, we label every candidate with independent rollouts of the deployed policy and measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses.” (研究方法)
* 第五句：“On failures not screened for repair value, pre-specified tests show that greedy replay loses 0.08-0.13 in expected net success gain in ALFWorld and 0.06-0.13 in net reward in WebShop, relative to selection with the deployed agent's own rollouts.” (实验结果1)
* 第六句：“At an equal rollout budget, selecting repairs for Qwen2.5-7B with Qwen2.5-14B rollouts loses 0.25 in ALFWorld and 0.07 in WebShop, twenty 14B rollouts per candidate are worth no more than two of the 7B agent's own, and fresh rollouts confirm that the two models prefer opposite repairs on selected disagreement cases.” (实验结果2)
* 第七句：“Between similar-sized models from different families, the losses appear in both directions in both environments (0.07-0.17).” (实验结果3)
* 第八句：“The scoring executor also changes repair-location labels and method rankings.” (实验结果4/影响)
* 第九句：“Repairs should be verified with the executor that will run them, and repair labels should name their executor.” (结论/建议)
3. 设计HTML结构：
* 这是一篇简短的技术摘要/新闻，不需要严格的``/`
`小节划分，但可以将其分为几个逻辑段落，或者将核心结论/问题高亮。
* 考虑到“长文用`
`/`
`划分小节”，这里不算特别长，但为了体现排版专业性，可以将“背景与问题”、“研究方法”、“实验结果”、“结论”进行划分，或者就按自然段落排版，并用``强调关键句子。
* 规则说“每个自然段落用``包裹”，原文是一整段。我需要把它拆分成几个语义段落，或者就保持一个长段落但用`
`？不，规则说“每个自然段落用`
`包裹”，最好按语义拆分成多个`
`。
* 拆分策略：
* 段落1（背景与方法）：When an LLM agent fails... measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses.
* 段落2（结果1 - Greedy Replay）：On failures not screened...
* 段落3（结果2 - 大小模型差异）：At an equal rollout budget...
* 段落4（结果3 - 不同家族模型）：Between similar-sized models...
* 段落5（影响与结论）：The scoring executor also changes... repair labels should name their executor.
* 或者，直接作为一个大段落，但用`
`加小标题？规则说“长文用`
`/`
`划分小节”，这篇不算长文，直接用`
`拆分自然段即可，或者添加适当的小标题让结构更清晰。 * 为了安全起见，避免“增删改内容”，我不添加原文没有的小标题文字。我将原文按句群拆分为几个`
`，并对重要句子使用``。 * 拆分如下： `
When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place. They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log. We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them.
` `
Holding failed trajectories and candidate single-step repairs fixed, we label every candidate with independent rollouts of the deployed policy and measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses.
` `
On failures not screened for repair value, pre-specified tests show that greedy replay loses 0.08-0.13 in expected net success gain in ALFWorld and 0.06-0.13 in net reward in WebShop, relative to selection with the deployed agent's own rollouts.
` `
At an equal rollout budget, selecting repairs for Qwen2.5-7B with Qwen2.5-14B rollouts loses 0.25 in ALFWorld and 0.07 in WebShop, twenty 14B rollouts per candidate are worth no more than two of the 7B agent's own, and fresh rollouts confirm that the two models prefer opposite repairs on selected disagreement cases.
` `
Between similar-sized models from different families, the losses appear in both directions in both environments (0.07-0.17). The scoring executor also changes repair-location labels and method rankings.
` `
Repairs should be verified with the executor that will run them, and repair labels should name their executor.
` 4. 校验规则： 1. 只输出HTML片段本身，不要Markdown围栏、不要解释。（满足） 2. 每个自然段落用`
`包裹，长文用`
`/`
`划分小节。（这里按语义拆分为多个`
`，没有强加标题，因为原文没有标题，强加标题算“增改内容”。如果非要用标题，可以用通用的如`
Background
`，但规则4说“不得增删改内容”，所以最好只用`
`和``）。 3. 列表内容用`
- `，引用用`
`，代码用`
`，重要句子可用``。（使用了``）。
4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。（仔细核对文字，完全一致，仅拆分了段落和增加了HTML标签）。
5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。（满足）。
5. 精细化排版：
为了让结构更清晰，且符合“长文用h2/h3划分”的暗示（虽然这篇不长，但学术摘要通常有结构），我可以使用``来代替部分文本的强调，但这会改变原文结构。所以最安全的做法是：将原文的9句话分成3个逻辑段落，每个段落用`
`包裹，关键句用``。 段落1（引言与问题）： When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place. They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log. We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them. 段落2（方法与实验结果）： Holding failed tra
`，代码用``，重要句子可用``。 4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。 5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。 * 输入文本：一段关于LLM agent修复方法的学术/技术新闻/摘要。 2. 分析输入文本结构： * 第一句：“When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place.” (引入背景) * 第二句：“They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log.” (现有方法) * 第三句：“We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them.” (提出问题/研究目标) * 第四句：“Holding failed trajectories and candidate single-step repairs fixed, we label every candidate with independent rollouts of the deployed policy and measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses.” (研究方法) * 第五句：“On failures not screened for repair value, pre-specified tests show that greedy replay loses 0.08-0.13 in expected net success gain in ALFWorld and 0.06-0.13 in net reward in WebShop, relative to selection with the deployed agent's own rollouts.” (实验结果1) * 第六句：“At an equal rollout budget, selecting repairs for Qwen2.5-7B with Qwen2.5-14B rollouts loses 0.25 in ALFWorld and 0.07 in WebShop, twenty 14B rollouts per candidate are worth no more than two of the 7B agent's own, and fresh rollouts confirm that the two models prefer opposite repairs on selected disagreement cases.” (实验结果2) * 第七句：“Between similar-sized models from different families, the losses appear in both directions in both environments (0.07-0.17).” (实验结果3) * 第八句：“The scoring executor also changes repair-location labels and method rankings.” (实验结果4/影响) * 第九句：“Repairs should be verified with the executor that will run them, and repair labels should name their executor.” (结论/建议) 3. 设计HTML结构： * 这是一篇简短的技术摘要/新闻，不需要严格的``/`
`小节划分，但可以将其分为几个逻辑段落，或者将核心结论/问题高亮。 * 考虑到“长文用`
`/`
`划分小节”，这里不算特别长，但为了体现排版专业性，可以将“背景与问题”、“研究方法”、“实验结果”、“结论”进行划分，或者就按自然段落排版，并用``强调关键句子。 * 规则说“每个自然段落用`
`包裹”，原文是一整段。我需要把它拆分成几个语义段落，或者就保持一个长段落但用`
`？不，规则说“每个自然段落用``包裹”，最好按语义拆分成多个`
`。 * 拆分策略： * 段落1（背景与方法）：When an LLM agent fails... measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses. * 段落2（结果1 - Greedy Replay）：On failures not screened... * 段落3（结果2 - 大小模型差异）：At an equal rollout budget... * 段落4（结果3 - 不同家族模型）：Between similar-sized models... * 段落5（影响与结论）：The scoring executor also changes... repair labels should name their executor. * 或者，直接作为一个大段落，但用`
`加小标题？规则说“长文用`
`/`
`划分小节”，这篇不算长文，直接用`
`拆分自然段即可，或者添加适当的小标题让结构更清晰。 * 为了安全起见，避免“增删改内容”，我不添加原文没有的小标题文字。我将原文按句群拆分为几个`
`，并对重要句子使用``。 * 拆分如下： `
When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place. They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log. We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them.
` `Holding failed trajectories and candidate single-step repairs fixed, we label every candidate with independent rollouts of the deployed policy and measure how much deployment value each evaluator's choice loses.
` `On failures not screened for repair value, pre-specified tests show that greedy replay loses 0.08-0.13 in expected net success gain in ALFWorld and 0.06-0.13 in net reward in WebShop, relative to selection with the deployed agent's own rollouts.
` `At an equal rollout budget, selecting repairs for Qwen2.5-7B with Qwen2.5-14B rollouts loses 0.25 in ALFWorld and 0.07 in WebShop, twenty 14B rollouts per candidate are worth no more than two of the 7B agent's own, and fresh rollouts confirm that the two models prefer opposite repairs on selected disagreement cases.
` `Between similar-sized models from different families, the losses appear in both directions in both environments (0.07-0.17). The scoring executor also changes repair-location labels and method rankings.
` `Repairs should be verified with the executor that will run them, and repair labels should name their executor.
` 4. 校验规则： 1. 只输出HTML片段本身，不要Markdown围栏、不要解释。（满足） 2. 每个自然段落用``包裹，长文用`
`/`
`划分小节。（这里按语义拆分为多个`
`，没有强加标题，因为原文没有标题，强加标题算“增改内容”。如果非要用标题，可以用通用的如`
Background
`，但规则4说“不得增删改内容”，所以最好只用``和``）。 3. 列表内容用`
- `，引用用`
`，代码用``，重要句子可用``。（使用了``）。 4. 保留原文所有信息，不得增删改内容。（仔细核对文字，完全一致，仅拆分了段落和增加了HTML标签）。 5. 不要输出``/``/``等文档级标签。（满足）。 5. 精细化排版： 为了让结构更清晰，且符合“长文用h2/h3划分”的暗示（虽然这篇不长，但学术摘要通常有结构），我可以使用``来代替部分文本的强调，但这会改变原文结构。所以最安全的做法是：将原文的9句话分成3个逻辑段落，每个段落用`
`包裹，关键句用``。 段落1（引言与问题）： When an LLM agent fails, repair methods choose which action to replace and what to put in its place. They often score candidate repairs with greedy replay, a stronger model, an environment oracle, or a judge that reads the failed log. We ask whether these evaluators pick repairs that help the agent that will actually execute them. 段落2（方法与实验结果）： Holding failed tra