We reply to the comments by M. Sienicki and K. Sienicki (arXiv:2512.07881) and by K. Sienicki (arXiv:2601.06104) on our work on quantum-mechanical statistics in human language (arXiv:2407.14924) and on quantum structure in AI-generated language (arXiv:2511.21731). We thank the authors for their careful reading and address what we consider to be the main points of criticism:
- the exploratory nature of the protocol used in the experiments with large language models;
- the role of marginal-law violations, and of the Contextuality-by-Default criterion, in the identification of entanglement;
- the limited diagnostic value of a Bose-Einstein fit taken in isolation;
- the meaning of assigning the lowest energy levels to the most frequent words;
- and the relation between the vector spaces used by LLMs and quantum state spaces.
We also correct a typographical error in Table 3 of arXiv:2511.21731, which does not affect the reported CHSH value.