De-identified résumé screening assumes that redacting explicit fields prevents ethnocultural inference; however, recent audits attribute residual leakage to declared languages.
We investigate whether eliminating language fields resolves this leakage across nine open-weight models and 620 counterfactual résumés.
By holding language attributes strictly identical, we isolate unstructured prose across five ethnocultural conditions and three cue-salience tiers.
Target-group recovery averages 0.757 overall and saturates at 1.000 under high salience, demonstrating that non-language prose sustains demographic inference.
Crucially, models diverge only under faint cues (0.086-0.690), establishing salience as an essential evaluation axis.
Furthermore, pairwise LLM-as-a-judge outcomes are highly sensitive to evaluation design: forbidding ties yields an apparent selection-rate ratio of 0.39 alongside strong position and content effects, whereas permitting ties produces near-universal ties for most models ($\ge94\%$).
Downstream scoring shows only very small between-condition differences, highlighting the need to distinguish demographic signals recoverable from résumé content from effects introduced by the evaluation protocol.