In so-called "Industry 4.0," integrated sensors, analytics tools, and other digital technologies supplement industrial workflows, potentiating enhanced visibility and automation.
Prognostics and health management (PHM) and natural language processing (NLP) practitioners alike have explored the application of large language models (LLMs) to industrial asset management, but many prior works' focus on exam-like benchmarks has limited their assessment of LLMs' ability to automate practical operations.
Introduction
Herein, we introduce CoffeeBench, a fault diagnostics task for LLM agents, using a simulated appliance.
The LLMs we evaluate struggle to consistently identify faults from the sensor information alone, but the best-performing ones can iteratively refine the fault-option space to eventually obtain a successful diagnosis.
Subsequent Analyses
Our subsequent analyses, therefore, focus on: differentiating models by diagnostic efficiency (RQ1); examining the lagging performance of the three worst models (RQ2); and identifying viable heuristics for selective prediction (RQ3), including that initial diagnostic uncertainty and LLM-judged soundness of reasoning are high-signal predictors of diagnostic success.
In addition to our benchmark results (Section 3.1), we provide practical insights for improving the performance of the open-weight models on CoffeeBench, such as by explicitly tracking episode state on their behalf to reduce timeouts (Section 3.2) or applying a deliberation loop to refine diagnostic hypotheses (Section 3.3).