When a trader executes a large order, the relevant question is not what will the price be? but what would the price have been had I not traded? Market impact is thus a causal quantity, yet classical models (Almgren--Chriss, propagators) regress price on flow, which is biased whenever informed flow moves prices through information as well as trading.
We present a proof-of-concept Causal Market Simulator: a continuous-time causal prior-data fitted network (PFN) trained on a synthetic market prior in which a hidden informational flow confounds the flow--price relation by construction, with confounding strength an exact per-episode knob.
On this prior, the naive estimator's bias follows a closed form we confirm empirically (up to 68% overestimation), while the PFN tracks the unbiased true-parameter oracle at high confounding.
Its do-ablated twin, the same model with the intervention inputs removed, collapses onto the pre-window mean.
Zero-shot, the model responds at the ground-truth scale to metaorders in an ABIDES limit-order book ($+0.38$ pre-onset standard deviations against seed-replay counterfactuals), and its intervention response replicates on about 2,300 detected flow bursts in BTC/ETH/SOL perpetuals and 3,800 on Nasdaq equities, evidence consistent with, though not proof of, causal transfer.
Off-prior the response degrades gracefully, and split-conformal recalibration repairs interval calibration.
Transfer hinges on encoding the metaorder as added flow rather than a clamped price level, not on more training.
A recurrent state-space variant closes the remaining shape gap: its impact accrues over execution duration where the transformer's stays flat, raising the correlation with measured metaorder impact from $+0.68$ to between $+0.92$ and $+0.96$, at the cost of weaker on-prior deconfounding that traces to the training recipe rather than to recurrence.