Task-oriented conversational agents remain fragile under realistic conditions, especially when users exhibit non-cooperative behavior.
Existing function-calling benchmarks underrepresent adversarial conversation trajectories, thereby limiting the training resources available for developing robust agents.
We present MADS (Multi-Agent Dialog Simulation)
a synthetic data generation pipeline that produces structured, diverse dialogue trajectories.
We inject adversarial conversation, producing validated conversation trajectories that capture realistic, unhappy paths.
Using MADS, we construct MADS-Bench:
a benchmark spanning six domains, 55 personas, and 1095 conversations, with approximately 66% of conversations containing failure-prone conversation scenarios.