While modern AI detectors identify who wrote the words, emerging policies on AI use increasingly hinge on a different question: who came up with the ideas?
We introduce IdeaLens
We introduce IdeaLens, a detector that identifies whether a document's ideas came from a human or AI (idea provenance), regardless of who wrote its words.
To focus IdeaLens on ideas rather than prose, we represent documents as outlines: lists of items that each pair a discourse role with a brief, paraphrased description of the content, minimizing word-level overlap with the raw text.
Training and Labeling
We train IdeaLens on 1M FineWeb documents with silver labels from Pangram, a prose provenance detector.
Since the outlines are largely stripped of surface-level information, the labels must be fit mainly through the ideas.
Controlled Study Results
In a controlled study, IdeaLens's AI flag rate drops from 95% to 7% as models write from increasingly detailed human plans, while Pangram 4 still flags 92%; from AI-derived plans, IdeaLens stays above 96%.
Conversely, on a new dataset of 50 stories that human authors wrote from AI-generated plans, IdeaLens flags 68% of the stories as AI, compared to 8% for Pangram 4.
Benchmark Performance
On a comprehensive suite of 19 existing detection benchmarks, we show that IdeaLens maintains strong detection rates at low false positive rates, suggesting that ideas themselves provide a powerful discriminative signal, and its performance holds across domains, formats, and languages.
Characterizing Systematic Differences
Finally, we examine 90K predictions from IdeaLens to characterize systematic differences between human and AI ideation.
Facilitating Future Research
We release our models and labeled datasets to facilitate future research on idea provenance detection.