Softmax attention has two structural gaps. A head cannot abstain, because its weights sum to one, so it outputs something even when nothing is relevant. Nor can it filter what it reads, because its output is a weighted average of value vectors, passing interference as faithfully as signal. We call these missing primitives abstention and noise filtering.
Recent studies report that gating the value pathway improves pretraining but attribute the gain to different causes. We show that a value gate partly supplies both primitives, which unifies the reported causes as views of one gain.
We give each primitive its own mechanism in matched models of 10M to 350M parameters and measure what each contributes. The gain from gating is almost entirely abstention at 10M, whereas by 350M filtering contributes as much as abstention, so what a study observes depends on its scale.
The two benefits are largely additive, with a small overlap. A gate determined by each value alone leaves the attention sink in place, whereas a query-controlled mechanism removes it.
Injecting interference into the value reads shows that abstention and filtering protect against it in distinguishable ways. The same patterns appear in pretrained models up to 20B parameters.