Large language models often exhibit a substantial gap between their performance in English and in lower-resourced languages on equivalent knowledge queries---a cross-lingual consistency issue that remains underexplored for Indian languages and their code-mixed counterparts.
To study this gap, we introduce IndicKLAR, an Indic extension of the KLAR-CLC benchmark covering 18 of the 22 scheduled Indian languages. For 11 widely used language pairs, we additionally provide code-mixed variants. Both monolingual and code-mixed inputs verified by native speakers.
This three-way alignment enables us to examine how knowledge recall consistency varies across English, code-mixed, and native Indian language inputs.
Across nine open-weight models, we find that the accuracy gap between native-language and English inputs can reach $\sim$0.50, while code-mixed inputs substantially reduce this gap, bringing performance within $\sim$0.05 of English without any model-level intervention.
Motivated by this finding, we evaluate several prompting strategies that differ in how explicitly language conversion is exposed: a two-stage translate-then-answer setup, a one-stage joint translation-and-answer prompt, and Translate-in-Thought (TinT)---a single-step strategy in which the model internally converts the input and outputs only the final answer.
Across the native $\rightarrow$ code-mixed $\rightarrow$ English performance trajectory, we observe a consistent flip point---the transition from incorrect to correct prediction---between the native and code-mixed settings.
Notably, this pattern holds both when the code-mixed representation is explicitly provided as input or when the model is prompted to convert internally using TinT.