Training data attribution for diffusion models aims to identify the training samples that influence a generated instance, but existing methods either require costly per-sample gradient computation or query-specific model optimization.
Moreover, most methods attribute changes in a proxy loss rather than changes in the actual model's generative behavior.
We address these limitations by formulating attribution directly with a local score discrepancy measure, which applies to any diffusion variant (including DDPM, EDM, and flow matching), and by showing that such measure can be estimated without retraining, as a preconditioned gradient similarity.
We instantiate this estimator as Training-data Influence via score Discrepancy (TID), which uses Kronecker-factored curvature to avoid random projections and per-sample gradient storage.
We then distill TID into TIDE, a forward-only student trained online to reproduce the teacher's rankings from the diffusion model's internal activations.
Under counterfactual evaluation on CIFAR-10, ArtBench-10, and MS-COCO, TID matches or outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, while TIDE retains most of TID's accuracy at four to five orders of magnitude lower per-query cost, attributing generated samples in milliseconds and faster than the generation itself.