Purpose: Behavior cloning can accumulate errors when a learned controller visits states outside the demonstrated distribution. This study evaluates whether Disagreement-Regularized Imitation Learning (DRIL), which converts disagreement among cloned policies into a reinforcement-learning reward, improves image-based continuous control.
Methods
A controlled CarRacing study combines Gaussian and Beta learner policies, demonstrations from either a clipped Gaussian expert or an intrinsically bounded Beta expert, one or 20 trajectories, deterministic and stochastic evaluation, and three retained stages: behavior cloning, the highest 10-episode training-score checkpoint, and the final DRIL checkpoint.
The disagreement ensemble contains five Gaussian policies in every variant. Each retained policy is evaluated over 100 procedurally generated episodes.
Results
Score-selected DRIL produced its largest gains in the few-demonstration setting, improving over the strongest behavior-cloning mean by 61% with clipped-action demonstrations and by 112% with bounded-action demonstrations. With 20 trajectories, the advantage of DRIL narrowed; in the bounded-action regime, Beta behavior cloning remained about 7% above the best DRIL checkpoint.
The experiments also show that the informativeness of the disagreement reward changes with the learner representation and training stage.
Conclusion
DRIL can substantially improve few-demonstration visual continuous control, while bounded Beta policies provide strong behavior-cloning performance when more demonstrations are available. The results highlight the joint importance of learner support, ensemble response, and checkpoint selection.