Reinforcement learning (RL) improves reasoning, but its performance depends on the policy from which training begins.
We study on-policy distillation (OPD) as a preparation stage for RL and ask whether its benefits extend beyond improvements in the distilled model's initial accuracy.
实验结果
Under shared RL settings, students initialized with OPD reach higher final performance than those trained with direct RL or supervised fine-tuning followed by RL.
This advantage can emerge even when OPD produces little immediate improvement in accuracy.
Pre-RL Pass@k does not fully explain the benefit: similar or even higher values do not necessarily lead to better performance after RL.
Behavioral analyses point to alignment with the teacher's distribution beyond top-1 agreement as a possible explanation.
Such alignment may favor higher-quality reasoning paths while retaining alternatives that RL can further refine using outcome feedback.
进一步研究
We further examine how trajectory sources and divergence objectives affect the value of distillation for subsequent RL.
Standard reverse-KL OPD performs better before RL, but forward-KL OPD overtakes it afterward; with teacher-generated distillation trajectories, reverse KL remains ahead at both stages.
These findings suggest that the preferred distillation objective depends on both the trajectory source and the training that follows.
Our results support evaluating OPD as preparation for RL and selecting distillation choices by the performance achieved after subsequent training.