Test-time scaling with parallel branches is widely adopted to improve performance on challenging reasoning tasks.
The predominant approach, repeated sampling, draws branches independently from a single policy, which can produce redundant attempts and thereby limit the gains from additional inference compute.
To address this limitation, we propose Planned Test-Time Scaling (PTTS), which replaces independent sampling with a coordinated joint policy: a planner generates a solution outline for each branch, steering the branches toward distinct reasoning paths, and an executor produces a full solution conditioned on each outline.
Formally, we show that PTTS strictly generalizes repeated sampling and, in a stylized setting, provably promotes coverage of complementary reasoning modes and yields better pass@k scaling.
We instantiate PTTS on top of strong reasoning models, keeping them fixed as executors while replacing repeated sampling with PTTS inference to further enhance test-time scaling.
Concretely, we develop two variants: PTTS-ZS prompts a model to jointly generate outlines for all branches in a single autoregressive pass, while PTTS-RL directly optimizes the planner against the pass@k reward using truncated execution rollouts for efficient training and a sharper reward signal.
Across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks with Qwen3-1.7B and 4B, PTTS-ZS improves pass@64 over repeated sampling by up to 6.7 points, while PTTS-RL further increases the gain to up to 13.4 points.
Further analysis indicates that broader coverage of distinct reasoning paths contributes to these gains.
Overall, PTTS provides a general framework for improving test-time scaling by coordinating reasoning branches, with zero-shot and trainable instantiations that yield substantial performance gains.