Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have made them widely used for code-related tasks.
Identifier names are statistically informative in naturally occurring code, but their information is not always reliable.
We investigate whether current LLMs assign disproportionate weight to lexical cues when renaming preserves program structure.
Introduction to Face/Off
We introduce Face/Off, a semantics-preserving identifier-renaming framework, and evaluate progressive naming conditions across multiple models and code-comprehension tasks.
Within this framework, lexical overemphasis is pervasive across the evaluated models and primary tasks:
- Performance generally decreases as identifier information is removed or made misleading.
- Outputs are often directed toward the meanings suggested by misleading names.
The pattern persists under representative prompt- and fine-tuning-based interventions, suggesting that lexical overemphasis is an entrenched problem.
A type-inference control confirms a boundary: naming effects are smaller when the answer is locally recoverable without the target name.
These results do not imply that identifiers are unhelpful; rather, they reveal a systematic vulnerability in how current LLMs balance lexical cues against program structure.
Findings and Motivation
Our findings motivate evaluations and modeling methods that preserve the benefits of natural code regularities while keeping conclusions grounded in accurate, formalized code semantics.