Retrieval over a personal memory store is retrospective: it surfaces what resembles the query, and it is blind to what the user has committed to do.
We describe a prospective term for memory retrieval that costs no inference at query time. Commitments are held in an explicit ledger as dated or trigger-conditioned entries; memory items linked to a firing entry receive a salience boost, blended multiplicatively into embedding-based retrieval so that relevance remains sovereign.
实验结果
On a synthetic prospective-memory task set modeled on TriggerBench's published structure (48 blind-authored dialogues, 175 tasks), the term raised recall@5 on the hard stratum from 0.000 to 0.955 at the default blend weight and to 1.000 under a floor variant, with zero false boosts across 53 resolved-commitment tasks.
Blind authorship also produced a scope finding: only 17-29% of naturally phrased commitment-trigger pairs defeat embedding similarity, so the term matters on a real minority of cases and must do no harm on the rest, which it does not.
设计定位
We position precomputed commitment linkage as the always-on floor of a layered design whose expansion layer is query-time prospection.
结果评估
Results are preliminary: the evaluation set is author-constructed, and evaluation on TriggerBench proper is committed follow-up work once its data is released.