Test-time reinforcement learning adapts a model on its own unlabeled test set using majority-vote pseudo-labels and has shown strong results in mathematics.
We show that this recipe collapses on medical multiple-choice QA: accuracy stagnates while output diversity rapidly declines.
Through a controlled experiment that keeps the questions, model, and optimizer fixed while changing only the answer space, we trace this failure to answer-space structure rather than domain difficulty.
In small answer spaces, incorrect rollouts often collide on the same wrong pseudo-label and reinforce it; in large answer spaces, they disperse and receive little reward.
This diagnosis motivates PROSE, Process Reward Guided Self-Training, which rewards reasoning quality instead of answer agreement.
PROSE scores each reasoning step with a medical process reward model, assigns the trajectory reward as the minimum score across steps, and enforces answer-format constraints.
Without labels, PROSE substantially improves a general Llama model, surpassing purpose-built medical models and matching much larger systems.
Because the process signal is internalized into the policy, the adapted model requires no reward model at inference and transfers its gains to unseen datasets.
We further show that the minimum aggregation is essential: mean aggregation can be exploited, saturating the proxy reward while degrading accuracy.