Machine translation systems are periodically upgraded to stronger models, but the available preference signal is human post-edits of an older system's outputs, which the newer model may already surpass.
Moreover, collecting fresh post-edits for every new model is prohibitively expensive. We call this the Stale Preference problem.
Standard DPO can fail in this setting: it may increase the likelihood of inferior post-edits, erode the model's existing quality, and fail to provide the per-token control needed to correct localized errors.
We introduce StalePO, an objective derived from three requirements this regime imposes.
Likelihood movement must be downward on both responses, the policy must be anchored to its own base response, and the KL constraint must apply at the token level.
These requirements are jointly necessary.
In ablations, each mechanism in isolation leaves the model's performance indistinguishable from the base model, and only their combination converts stale feedback into gains.
On English-to-Hindi and English-to-Turkish localization data, StalePO improves the fraction of segments passing all LLM-as-judge MQM quality checks by 14.9 and 4.6 percentage points, respectively, with gains concentrated on style and fluency.
A human evaluation under the same framework confirms these gains on English-to-Hindi, raising the fraction of segments passing all seven human checks by 13.8 percentage points.