首页 > AI前沿 > Crash Narrative-Guided Countermeasure Recommendation Using Large Language Models: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Intersection Safety

Crash Narrative-Guided Countermeasure Recommendation Using Large Language Models: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Intersection Safety

arXiv自然语言 2026-09-16 12:00 2 阅读 查看原文
arXiv:2609.15997 (cs)

Title:Crash Narrative-Guided Countermeasure Recommendation Using Large Language Models: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Intersection Safety

View PDF
Abstract:Improving safety at intersections requires identifying crash mechanisms and recommending appropriate countermeasures. However, this process traditionally relies on expert judgment, making it labor-intensive, difficult to scale, and dependent on the availability of experienced traffic safety engineers. Although crash narratives contain rich description of crash mechanisms, this unstructured information remains largely underutilized in safety analyses. This study presents a crash narrative-guided retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework that translates narrative-derived crash mechanisms into site-specific countermeasure recommendations. Key mechanism attributes including traffic control, signal indication, driver fault, vehicle movement, and travel direction were extracted from crash narratives and linked to evidence-based treatments from the FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures and the CMF Clearinghouse. The framework integrates embedding-based retrieval of historically similar intersections, association-rule mining, statistical guidance on the expected number of relevant countermeasures, and an engineering reasoning guidance that directs LLM through a domain-consistent decision process before selecting countermeasures. Evaluated on 312 fatal and serious-injury crashes across 115 intersections in Lake and Sumter Counties, Florida, using five-fold cross-validation, the framework achieved a precision of 0.82, recall of 0.85, and F1-score of 0.82, while recommending an average of 3.91 countermeasures per location with 3.14 matching, closely matching the actual average (3.86). Overall, the proposed framework demonstrates the potential of retrieval-augmented LLMs as an interpretable and scalable decision-support tool for transportation agencies for translating crash narratives into countermeasure recommendations.
Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.15997 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.15997v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15997

Submission history

From: Parvez Anowar [view email]
[v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 17:26:23 UTC (1,466 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.