首页 > AI前沿 > Newton Matching for Generative Modeling: A Unified Framework for Fine-Tuning and Sampling

Newton Matching for Generative Modeling: A Unified Framework for Fine-Tuning and Sampling

arXiv机器学习 2026-09-09 12:00 4 阅读 查看原文
arXiv:2609.05727 (cs)

Title:Newton Matching for Generative Modeling: A Unified Framework for Fine-Tuning and Sampling

View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We develop Newton Matching, a unified framework for fine-tuning and sampling in generative modeling. The target is $\pi\propto\mu e^{\tau r}$, where $r$ is the reward, $\tau>0$ the inverse temperature, and $\mu$ denotes the pretrained model's terminal density for fine-tuning or the constant $1$ for sampling. We shift the paradigm from isolated losses to iterative optimization over canonical models: population minimizers of standard conditional matching for terminal densities. Under compatible smooth-realization assumptions, canonical velocities form a manifold diffeomorphic to the density manifold. Transporting the Fisher-Rao metric and mixture connection to this manifold, we show that the reverse-KL Hessian equals the metric, so the Newton direction coincides with the negative Fisher-Rao gradient. At terminal density $\rho$, each stage takes a tangential step generated by the regularized reward $r-\frac1\tau\log(\rho/\mu)$, followed by terminal-density-preserving canonicalization. This canonical retraction yields an exact finite-stepsize density characterization. For the ideal iteration, we prove strict reverse-KL descent away from the target for $0 < \eta \le \tau$, global convergence under mild conditions, and local quadratic convergence for full steps ($\eta=\tau$). Covariance and gradient forms, each with forward or reverse regression-pair constructions, yield sample-wise tangential-update losses with the same population minimizer, without importance sampling or full-trajectory backpropagation. We develop approximate updates and define critical-point consistency as vanishing tangential displacement if and only if $\rho=\pi$. We recover representative methods as exact realizations, critical-point-consistent approximations, or objective-altering variants, enabling modular algorithm design. Our work advances the theory and algorithms of reinforcement learning for generative models.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.05727 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.05727v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05727

Submission history

From: Zeyang Li [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 21:17:05 UTC (3,230 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.