Fermat's Last Theorem in Lean 4

Fermat's Last Theorem in Lean 4 A complete, machine-checked proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in Lean 4, built on Mathlib (Lean 4.33.1; Mathlib v4.33.0, pinned by commit in lakefile.lean). The argument is that of Frey, Serre, Ribet, Wiles and Taylor-Wiles. PROOF-PATH.md names each step and the Lean theorem that carries it, and the html/ folder presents the whole proof as web pages you can browse offline (see "Reading the proof in a browser" below). Research artifact. Not maintained and not accepting contributions. The statement Theorems/Thm_fermat_last_theorem.lean declares theorem fermat_last_theorem (n : ℕ) (hn : 3 ≤ n) (a b c : ℕ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a ^ n + b ^ n ≠ c ^ n and the default build target FinalCheck.lean contains /-- info: 'fermat_last_theorem' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] -/ #guard_msgs in #print axioms fermat_last_theorem so the build fails unless the proof rests on exactly Lean's three standard axioms (no sorry, no added axiom, no native_decide). FinalCheck.lean also derives Mathlib's own statement, FermatLastTheorem, from this theorem. How it was verified Build. A from-scratch lake build on Lean 4.33.1 (which includes the 2026 kernel soundness fixes), with Mathlib compiled from source. All 60,475 modules of this repository built, every declaration was checked by the Lean kernel, and the axioms are as above. comparator. leanprover/comparator v4.33.0 checked the build against verification/comparator/Challenge.lean, which states the theorem using only Mathlib. It confirmed that the proved statement and every constant it mentions are identical to the challenge, that no other axiom is used, and that the whole proof, Mathlib included, replays through the Lean kernel. Verdict: Your solution is okay! A second kernel. nanoda 0.4.13, an independent Lean kernel written in Rust, accepted an export of the same environment (written with lean4export): Checked 1052234 declarations with no errors. We built nanoda with four small patches of our own (verification/nanoda/patches/): one adds progress output and three speed up its definitional-equality search, without which a few declarations of this proof occupy unmodified nanoda for many hours each. None of the patches adds, removes or weakens a typing rule. No module contains axiom, sorry, native_decide, unsafe, extern, implemented_by, partial def or #eval (Challenge.lean uses sorry by design and is not part of the package). Together, these checks establish that the statement above follows from the three axioms, given trust in the Lean kernel (or nanoda) and the checking tools. The statement is written with Lean's built-in natural numbers, +, ≤, < and ≠; its one Mathlib ingredient is ^ on ℕ, which Mathlib defines as Lean's built-in exponentiation, and comparator checks that every definition the statement mentions is identical to stock Mathlib's. Nothing else in Mathlib has to be trusted, because the kernel checks everything beneath the statement. What no tool can check is that each intermediate theorem means what its name suggests; that is for the reader to judge, and PROOF-PATH.md names the Lean theorem behind each step and states exactly how strong each named classical result is as proved here. Reading the proof in a browser The html/ folder (about 390 MB) presents this repository as static web pages: the route of the proof step by step; a page for each of the 29,511 theorems (the exact Lean statement, what it cites and what cites it, and an expandable dependency graph) and for each of the 1,450 definition modules (the full source and which statements use it); a search box over all theorem and definition names; the landmark theorems as a graph; and README.md, PROOF-PATH.md and ATTRIBUTION.md rendered with cross-links. The folder is part of this repository, so a clone or a ZIP download already contains it (if you obtained html/ as a separate archive, unpack it at the repository root). Open html/index.html in a web browser; everything works offline, with no web server. The pages were machine-tested in a Chromium-based browser only, and html/README-DOCS.md explains what is quoted from the Lean files and what is generated (the English summaries and suggested references are generated automatically; the Lean statement is authoritative). Check it yourself You need Linux or macOS (some paths are too long for Windows), elan (it installs Lean 4.33.1 from lean-toolchain), and a network connection: Lake fetches Mathlib from GitHub and compiles it from source, since no prebuilt Mathlib matches this toolchain (about 13 minutes at 96 jobs). The build needs about 5 GB of memory per parallel job (a few modules need up to 36 GB); about 67 GB of disk under .lake/, plus C files (about 220 GB) that can be deleted as the build goes. Ours took 5 h 32 min at 96 jobs, with a peak of 153 GB of memory. comparator takes about 15 hours (ours: 14 h 46 min), nearly all of it the kernel replay on one core. Our peak memory was 230 GB, so allow 300 GB. Run nanoda after the comparator script, whose tools it reuses. Writing the 37.8 GB export takes about 90 GB of memory for an hour, and the check itself about 40 GB (about 30 minutes at 16 threads). Both scripts are for Linux (bash, git, python3, GNU coreutils; nanoda also needs patch, cargo and crates.io). git clone flt && cd flt LEAN_NUM_THREADS=96 lake build # one job per hardware thread by default; lower it to bound memory (about 5 GB per job) verification/comparator/run.sh # verdict: last line of .verify-work/wrapper/comparator.log verification/nanoda/run.sh # after the comparator script; verdict: .verify-work/nanoda/run-*/nanoda.stdout Lean prints a large number of deprecation and style-linter warnings while building. They do not affect the result. The build has succeeded when its output ends with 'flt_mathlib' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] and Build completed successfully. Each script fetches and builds its checker at a pinned version and exits 0 on success. About the sources FinalCheck.lean is the default target; Theorems/ holds the statements, P2M/Sol/ the proofs (each importing the statements it cites), Definitions/ the definitions, verification/ the two checks, html/ the web pages described above and tools/docs-site/ the program that generated them. The Lean sources were produced by AI agents building on human-written open-source Lean, with Lean as the arbiter, and are written to be checked rather than read: names are machine-generated, labels such as P2M or hexadecimal suffixes are pipeline labels rather than mathematics, and where a name and a statement disagree the statement is what was proved. Comments were removed, apart from upstream notices, doc strings and citations (listed in ATTRIBUTION.md) and the expected-output comment that #guard_msgs checks. Licence and attribution Copyright 2026 Anthropic, PBC; released under the Apache License 2.0 (LICENSE). Portions derive from three Apache-2.0 projects credited in NOTICE: the Imperial College London FLT project led by Kevin Buzzard (Frey package, Galois representations, deformation theory, patching and more), flt-regular (Kummer's theorem) and Mathlib. ATTRIBUTION.md lists the 106 files containing material from the first two, with upstream file, copyright holder and authors, and the 23 files that reproduce Mathlib text (the excerpts in Definitions/Def_Compat_Mathlib430.lean and twenty-two modules that re-prove a Mathlib lemma in place). The web pages bundle KaTeX and Graphviz (compiled to WebAssembly) under their own licences, listed in html/assets/vendor/LICENSES.txt. Lean and the packages in lake-manifest.json are fetched at build time, not distributed here. If you recognise unattributed material, the omission is unintentional.