首页 > AI前沿 > Where Does Harness-Optimization Value Live? Localized Gains and the Budget-Splitting Trap in Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Where Does Harness-Optimization Value Live? Localized Gains and the Budget-Splitting Trap in Self-Evolving LLM Agents

arXiv自然语言 2026-09-04 12:00 5 阅读 查看原文

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.02889 (cs)

Title:Where Does Harness-Optimization Value Live? Localized Gains and the Budget-Splitting Trap in Self-Evolving LLM Agents

View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A growing body of work improves frozen large language models (LLMs) as agents by evolving their harness: the textual scaffolding around the model, including persona, strategy, format rules, and control heuristics. Existing reflective prompt-evolution methods usually optimize this harness as one flat string. We instead ask where the optimization value actually resides. We introduce HARNESSEVO, which decomposes the harness into four separately evolvable slots: role, task-strategy, tool/format-rules, and reflection/control. Using the same reflective optimizer under an iso-budget setting, we pair this decomposition with leave-one-in and leave-one-out attribution to measure the contribution of each slot.
On ALFWorld with a frozen 7B backbone, HARNESSEVO does not significantly improve the overall binary success rate over either the stock harness or flat-string evolution: 0.657 versus 0.642 and 0.642, respectively. However, the slot-level analysis reveals that nearly all useful optimization value is localized in the reflection/control slot, which achieves a leave-one-in gain of +0.119. The other slots are individually null. We further show that uniform budget splitting is harmful: allocating 64 rollouts across four slots leaves only 16 per slot, below the optimizer's effective search floor, causing every slot to freeze at its empty seed. Concentrating the budget on the high-credit control slot recovers the lost gain, reaching 0.761 with half the split budget.
The effect is task-contingent. On WebShop, all slots freeze empty and all methods tie, indicating a genuine absence of recurrent, verbalizable control failures rather than budget starvation. Overall, our results suggest that harness value is localized, uniform budget splitting can be actively harmful, and credit assignment should precede structured agent-evolution.
Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.02889 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.02889v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02889

Submission history

From: Michael Nguyen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:45:13 UTC (688 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.