首页 > AI前沿 > Beyond Raw Transcripts: Structured Persona Extraction for LLM-Based Digital Twins

Beyond Raw Transcripts: Structured Persona Extraction for LLM-Based Digital Twins

arXiv自然语言 2026-08-24 12:00 1 阅读 查看原文

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.20344 (cs)

Title:Beyond Raw Transcripts: Structured Persona Extraction for LLM-Based Digital Twins

View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:LLM-based "digital twins" aim to simulate how an individual would behavein new environments or respond to novel questions, given some representation of that individual's prior responses. A common approach constructs this representation from survey transcripts or summaries responses. Prior work shows that compressing long transcripts into shorter LLM-generated summaries does not significantly reduce predictive accuracy, suggesting that information volume is not the primary bottleneck.
In this work, we argue that the key limitation is instead structural:how persona information is organized before being provided to thesimulator model. We study this by comparing unstructured summaries with structured persona representations. First, we introduce a hand-craftedschema (BDE: Background, Decision procedure, Evaluation), grounded in consumer-behavior theory, and show that it improves predictive accuracy over raw transcripts by +1.91 percentage points on a homogeneous benchmark (Twin-2K-500), with similar gains on gpt-5.4-mini and Qwen3-8B as robustness checks. However, this fixed structure does not generalizeacross more heterogeneous tasks, where performance is statistically indistinguishable from the raw transcript baseline.
To address this limitation, we propose an automatic structure-discovery pipeline in which an LLM iteratively proposes and refines task-specific persona structures and extraction prompts. On a benchmark of 13 diverse sub-studies, this approach restores performance, improving mean accuracy by +1.91 percentage points over the raw transcript baseline and eliminating significant losses observed with the fixed schema.
Overall, our results suggest that the main constraint in LLM-based digital twins is not how much information is provided, but how it is structured -- and that the optimal structure depends on the task.
Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.20344 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.20344v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20344

Submission history

From: Tianze Deng Mr. [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Jun 2026 19:00:54 UTC (220 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.