首页 > 随笔 > How Do Linear Probes Emerge? A Circuit-Tracing Framework with Concept-Targeted Attribution

How Do Linear Probes Emerge? A Circuit-Tracing Framework with Concept-Targeted Attribution

arXiv自然语言 2026-08-31 12:00 5 阅读 查看原文

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.27510 (cs)

Title:How Do Linear Probes Emerge? A Circuit-Tracing Framework with Concept-Targeted Attribution

View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Transcoder attribution graphs are usually trained to explain why a model assigns high probability to a particular next token. We introduce Concept-Targeted Attribution (CTA), which instead trains attribution graphs with respect to a linear probe direction. CTA therefore yields probe-specific circuits that explain why an internal concept representation arises in a prompt, independently of whether it is expressed in the generated token. Using Cross-Layer Transcoders, we show that these probe-targeted graphs contain predictive structure: graph-level features predict probe accuracy across four widely studied concept categories ($\rho = 0.91$, $R^2 = 0.84$), while local features identify the sparse components driving per-prompt classification. This connects probe performance to interpretable circuit structure, allowing us to ask not only whether a probe works, but which internal computations make it work. Causal ablations further show that probe-targeted and logit-targeted graphs capture functionally distinct mechanisms. Removing probe-relevant features reduces internal concept scores while largely preserving generated tokens, whereas removing logit-relevant features changes the generated token in 92% to 100% of cases with near-zero effect on probe scores. CTA provides a framework for moving from behavioral probe accuracy to mechanistic explanations of probe performance, enabling more detailed audits of internal concept representations, including safety-critical ones. Our code is available at this https URL
Comments:
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.27510 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.27510v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27510

Submission history

From: Zhijing Jin [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:12:49 UTC (1,632 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.